<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Electric Fishwrap &#187; politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electricfishwrap.com/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electricfishwrap.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:13:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Shocking facts about Barack Obama &#8212; Not</title>
		<link>http://electricfishwrap.com/2008/07/shocking-facts-about-barack-obama-not/</link>
		<comments>http://electricfishwrap.com/2008/07/shocking-facts-about-barack-obama-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fact-checking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricfishwrap.com/blog/2008/07/27/shocking-facts-about-barack-obama-not/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of late, items have been hitting my inbox such as &#8220;Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama&#8221; and &#8220;OBAMA&#8217;S TROUBLING INTERNET FUND RAISING!&#8221;
How shocking, if only it were true. 
The e-mails I get nearly on a daily basis should not faze me. People make stuff up all the time to smear one candidate and boost another. But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of late, items have been hitting my inbox such as &#8220;<a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/464/">Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama</a>&#8221; and &#8220;<a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/558/">OBAMA&#8217;S TROUBLING INTERNET FUND RAISING!</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>How shocking, if only it were true. <img src="http://electricfishwrap.com/blog/blogpics/politifact.jpg" style="margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 0px" align="right" height="352" width="300" /></p>
<p>The e-mails I get nearly on a daily basis should not faze me. People make stuff up all the time to smear one candidate and boost another. But I get these e-mails from my relatives, for whom I care deeply. I won&#8217;t say which two are the worst offenders. My purpose is not to make them look foolish.</p>
<p>I open the email, and read the first few lines, then check <a href="http://www.snopes.com/">Snopes</a> or <a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/">PolitiFact</a> immediately. Usually eye-rolling ensues, and I fire back an e-mail reminding them to check the two Web sites, knowing it will do no good anyway.</p>
<p>Today I&#8217;d had enough. I got the email about <a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/403/">Obama and McCain&#8217;s tax policies</a> (the copy of the e-mail I received had been further altered to make it less true). The person who sent it to me is married to an accountant.</p>
<p>I hit reply to all. I know that&#8217;s a bad idea in almost any case. I linked to Snopes and to PolitiFact, as usual. Does anyone believe these e-mails enough to the point where it changes opinion? Somehow I doubt that. For the most part, people vote the party, not the person.</p>
<p>Finally, I don&#8217;t favor either candidate or party, nor would I say if I did. I don&#8217;t think reporters of any stripe should tip their hat to anyone about what they believe or who they support. But I will always be annoyed when someone spreads a lie when a simple Internet search would reveal the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://electricfishwrap.com/2008/07/shocking-facts-about-barack-obama-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schools might get simple majority after all</title>
		<link>http://electricfishwrap.com/2007/11/schools-might-get-simple-majority-after-all/</link>
		<comments>http://electricfishwrap.com/2007/11/schools-might-get-simple-majority-after-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 02:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electricfishwrap.com/blog/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here in Washington State, there was a ballot issue called 4204. Simply put, school district levy elections (to pay for operations and property maintenance) would pass with a simple majority (50 percent + 1) instead of a super majority (60 percent). In the past few years, many Washington school districts have had their levy elections [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Washington State, there was a ballot issue called 4204. Simply put, school district levy elections (to pay for operations and property maintenance) would pass with a simple majority (50 percent + 1) instead of a super majority (60 percent). In the past few years, many Washington school districts have had their levy elections pass the simple majority test but fall short of 60 percent.</p>
<p>On Election Day, results were tabulated across the state, and it appeared that 4204 was going down (roughly 48 percent to 52 percent). But a last-minute get-out-the-vote surge, continuing at this moment, seems to bring the election into the &#8220;too close to call&#8221; range (see the Secretary of State&#8217;s <a href="http://vote.wa.gov/elections/WEI/ResultsByCounty.aspx?RaceID=100013&amp;CountyCode=%20&amp;ElectionID=0&amp;RaceTypeCode=M">Web page for 4204</a>). As you can see, only 2,620 votes separate the schools from a win here.</p>
<p>With more than <a href="http://vote.wa.gov/elections/WEI/VoterTurnout.aspx">178,000 votes left to count</a>, 58,000 of them in King County (where there&#8217;s a 50-percent approval rating) it doesn&#8217;t take a statistician to see where this is going.</p>
<p>Yes, Election Day is like the Super Bowl for journalists (well, except sports journalists). I&#8217;ve always loved the excitement of it. But here in Washington the results can trickle in until several days after Election Day, because you&#8217;re only required to have your ballot postmarked by then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://electricfishwrap.com/2007/11/schools-might-get-simple-majority-after-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
